Consequences of fragmented cancer data
A single cancer case generates an enormous amount of data, such as radiology, specialty pharmacy, hospital utilization, care management and behavioral health information.
Taken together, this data should paint a picture of a patient’s experience, from how well their treatment is working to the state of their mental health. Unfortunately, that's not always the case.
A JAMA study found that as much as 71% of non–small cell lung cancer records and 54.7% of breast cancer records were missing key data such as cancer stage, treatment types and demographic information.1
When oncology data is fragmented, the consequences are very real:
Delayed intervention
In a siloed system, warning signs, like a missed diagnostic follow-up, stay hidden for longer. One study found that every four-week delay in treatment raises mortality by 6% to 13% for common cancers.2
Preventable acute care
Chemotherapy patients visit the emergency department (ED) on average twice per year. The surprising part is that more than half of those visits are potentially preventable with timely outpatient coordination.3
Hidden financial risks
Cancer is now the top cost driver for employers for the fourth year in a row.4 And while some high-cost claims are tough to predict, warning signs, like an unfilled prescription or an ED visit, can be found in connected data.
Programs that connect these warning signs can provide quantifiable results, such as the Optum Cancer Support Program (CSP), which delivers a >2:1 ROI. The CSP program uses data to predict risk for complications and hospital utilization. In addition, CSP nurses proactively follow up with members within three business days of a hospital discharge.5
To close this divide, payers and employers need help integrating data and insights into workflows. Having a complete view of a cancer patient’s journey, including medical claims, electronic health records (EHRs), pharmacy data and behavioral health insights, is the type of integrated approach that helps uncover high-risk patterns and ensure the right support is delivered to the right patients at the right time.
The proof is in the research. A study of metastatic breast cancer patients found that linking insurance claims to EHRs resulted in better diagnosis coverage and higher adverse event detection rates.6