As CAR T-cell therapies gain traction and become more widely accessible, they are set to have a significant impact on the healthcare landscape. And that raises pressing questions for payers. How can they prepare for an influx of cellular therapy patients? And what are appropriate strategies for managing high-cost, clinically complex cases?
1. Understand the total cost of care
CAR T-cell therapies are complex, high-touch treatments — the opposite of taking a pill. For this reason, a coverage strategy must factor in how intensive the therapies can be and the risks they present.
For example, patients often require significant support while undergoing the therapy, including close monitoring afterward for serious adverse reactions, such as cytokine release syndrome, as well as brain swelling and other life-threatening neurological events requiring hospitalization.
Direct CAR T-cell treatment costs can include apheresis (the T-cell extraction process), biopsies, CAR T-cell production, hospital stays, imaging studies and bridging therapies (treatments given to patients while they are waiting for the cells to be manufactured). And for patients who don’t live near a certified treatment center, indirect costs may include travel, housing and caregiver support.
Therapy list prices account for most but not all of the costs of care. Optum 2023 CAR T-cell cost data shows an average total billed charges of $2.2 million,10 highlighting the steep cost of the additional charges outside of the biologic itself.
A well-rounded cost-management strategy will need to factor in all aspects of the care continuum, including post-treatment monitoring, rehabilitation and any additional care related to complications or side effects.
Fortunately, there is some good news on the cost horizon. If off-the-shelf therapies come to market, they could help reduce total per-patient cost of care compared to existing approved approaches. This is because the existing processes require costly individualized CAR T-cell production, along with care administered while a patient awaits the customized therapy.
2. Develop clear coverage policies
Because CAR T-cell therapy treatments are expensive and complex, it’s important that they are covered appropriately under existing plans. Payers should develop working policies that include:
Eligibility criteria: Define the patient populations that would most benefit from cellular therapies. This could include certain cancer types, genetic conditions or rare diseases that have limited treatment options.
Reimbursement structures: Given the high costs of the treatments, payers will need to carefully consider financial factors such as reimbursement rates and copays.
Strategic contracts: Through its CAR T Preferred Provider Network, a Center of Excellence network, Optum has been able to drive down costs for payers by negotiating rates with certified treatment centers. These agreements help limit the volatility seen in CAR-T charges, providing more predictable costs and greater financial protection for payers. In addition, by working with a trusted network of providers, payers can further reduce markups on biologic costs.
3. Understand all treatment options
Any effective coverage strategy should ensure members have access to the full spectrum of treatment options. A CAR T-cell therapy may be a great option for one person but be inappropriate for another.
More broadly, payers need to determine they have a prior authorization process in place so they can identify a potential CAR T-cell therapy case — then make sure all appropriate treatment options have been considered. This can both help support optimal health outcomes and manage total cost of care.
4. Consider the value of outpatient care
University-based medical centers have been the most common sites for CAR T-cell therapy administration. The need for some patients to travel far from home has limited access and sometimes created delays in treatment, which can worsen outcomes.
While CAR T-cell therapy has historically been administered mainly on an inpatient basis, it is increasingly being offered on an outpatient basis or a mixture of both. A 2024 study9 of patients with lymphoma found that outpatient community hospital care was as effective as inpatient care for CAR T-cell therapies.
If outpatient CAR T-cell treatment is as safe and effective as inpatient treatment for some patients — and is more convenient for members — a coverage strategy could be designed accordingly to reduce the cost of care. Reducing inpatient care can lead to significant savings, not only on hospital facility charges but also on ancillary costs like lodging and travel for patients who must travel long distances to treatment centers.
As outpatient care becomes more common, payers could work to develop networks that facilitate these treatment options for members, optimizing both costs and patient outcomes.